Michigan Engineering News

Zannatun Alim and Fabiha Khan work on their team's robot during an open house in the Michigan Engineering Zone (MEZ) in 2019. Photo: Joseph Xu/Michigan Engineering, Communications & Marketing

Opinion: It’s time for engineering to be equity-centered

In an op-ed for Inside Higher Ed, Dean Gallimore says diversity, equity and inclusion should be a required part of engineering schools’ curricula.

In technical fields, we often pride ourselves on our objectivity — as though the work exists outside ourselves. In engineering, we have historically believed that we could make technologies that work for anyone, regardless of the identity of the engineer or the user. We have believed that technological progress was inherently making the world a better place.

And, in many ways, it has. From the wheel to the automobile, the printing press to the internet, eyeglasses to orbiting telescopes, engineering has expanded humanity’s horizons and improved the human condition. But it has become clear that such technologies and systems do not benefit everyone equally. At times, they can even actively harm some groups. Unintended consequences can occur, because engineers are people, too — people shaped by their cultures, with biases and blind spots.

That’s why, earlier this year, I joined fellow engineering deans in submitting a letter to the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology recommending that they add diversity, equity and inclusion requirements for accreditation of engineering programs. Engineering must provide deep technical training, yes. But it must also require nontechnical training in fields such as ethics, social science, the humanities, history and matters associated with equity.

This article is republished from Inside Higher Ed. Read the full article.

Media Contact

Kate McAlpine

Research News Editor